This is a curious but common choice for many organisations. Organisations that feel their IT budgets are out of control appoint a financial expert as the CIO. This person feels their primary purpose is to save money, so they tend to cut things critical to an innovative organisation and ignore things that are difficult to put numbers to. They are easily manipulated by savvy vendors or internal technical staff with an agenda.
We believe cutting investment in your future is rarely good financial policy, especially in IT, where change is more rapid than any other function. The financial CIO will cut things like R&D, training, investment planning, project support, relationship and change management.
MXA knows two examples of a large SaaS provider that won lucrative contracts offering big platinum license discounts, which the financial CIO thought was a great deal. What they didn’t know, because they didn't sponsor sufficient technical leadership in their team, was that it would take more than 18 months of development for the solution to work within their environment. During this time, the multi-million-dollar license fees still had to be paid, because the vendor had negotiated with understated implementation timelines. In both cases, the platinum-level functionality wasn’t even needed by the business.
This choice of CIO will undermine the organisation's ability to seize innovation opportunities, frustrate staff to the point of leaving, and, in the end, negatively impact the bottom line.